Talk:Definitions of loglanghood
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
loglanghood loglangologizing monoparsing
I'm not sure if it is a good idea for the wiki to use and encourage words which are... newly-minted? unique? dubiously-defined? made-up?
This is ultimately about describing constructed languages, but I'm questioning how constructive freshly constructed words are in the description.
DerSaidin (talk) 06:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
D, I disagree with your notion of ‘dubiously defined’. It's pretty clear what those words mean, looking at their derivation.
The only word I would complain about is ‘monoparsing’, but that term comes with a definition next to it, so I don't see a problem with it in the end.
~uakci 10:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)