Talk:Liva: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The template looks great so far! Eventually templates will have their own pages, I assume. I have a few suggestions: * Name should be Section 1.1, IMO, loosely following Wikip...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Some languages will need a formal discussion of the underlying logic; this is not completely contained within syntax but could fall under the Syntax section, or a broader Semantics section, or could be its own section. | * Some languages will need a formal discussion of the underlying logic; this is not completely contained within syntax but could fall under the Syntax section, or a broader Semantics section, or could be its own section. | ||
* Every language needs a Pragmatics section as much as it needs a Prosody section. Isn't "self-segregation strategy" part of Morphology? Some languages will definitely need a Criticism section or subsection; others could have a broader Reception section. | * Every language needs a Pragmatics section as much as it needs a Prosody section. Isn't "self-segregation strategy" part of Morphology? Some languages will definitely need a Criticism section or subsection; others could have a broader Reception section. | ||
* Would prefer "References" over "Sources," following what seems to be more common on Wikipedia. | |||
[[User:Selguha|Selguha]] ([[User talk:Selguha|talk]]) 19:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC) | [[User:Selguha|Selguha]] ([[User talk:Selguha|talk]]) 19:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:16, 29 April 2020
The template looks great so far! Eventually templates will have their own pages, I assume. I have a few suggestions:
- Name should be Section 1.1, IMO, loosely following Wikipedian practice.
- Syllables and phonotactics overlap and could be combined in some articles, if not this one.
- Some languages will need a formal discussion of the underlying logic; this is not completely contained within syntax but could fall under the Syntax section, or a broader Semantics section, or could be its own section.
- Every language needs a Pragmatics section as much as it needs a Prosody section. Isn't "self-segregation strategy" part of Morphology? Some languages will definitely need a Criticism section or subsection; others could have a broader Reception section.
- Would prefer "References" over "Sources," following what seems to be more common on Wikipedia.