Talk:List of loglangs and quasi-loglangs: Difference between revisions
(removed own soliloquy)
(→Tables?: new section)
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
Revision as of 20:10, 25 March 2020
I think we should(eventually) put the info on languages in a big table, in one section. The table would include one or more columns for characteristics. Then in another section, we could create another table of the characteristics, and then list the languages that have that characteristic simply by name, in other words a reverse mapping.
I have too many nitpicks to list here, but I'll mention one. I am not sure that "Loglandic" and "Loglan-influenced" groupings are too useful. In one sense, nearly all of these languages have some kind of influence from Loglan, either directly or through Lojban. In another sense, only Lojban was crazy enough to maintain such a complicated (but undeniably signature) system for forming base words, compounds and borrows, making the two LoCCans rather small closed family.